In an increasingly opaque geopolitical landscape, journalist and media entrepreneur Daniel Hadad has broken a suggestive silence to release a "scoop" that, curiously, he chose not to publish on his own website, Infobae . According to Hadad, 2027 will mark the beginning of a direct US intervention against the United Kingdom to "resolve" the conflict over the sovereignty of the Malvina Islands. Under the pretext of ensuring the security of the transoceanic passage through the Drake Passage in the face of a potential vulnerability of the Panama Canal, Washington would seek to impose a forced peace in the South Atlantic.

The Embassy Informant: A Link That Goes Back A Long Way

To understand the significance of these statements, it is imperative to remember who Daniel Hadad is on the map of US influence in Argentina . He is not an independent analyst; he is, according to WikiLeaks leaks compiled in the book ArgenLeaks , one of the most frequent and loyal interlocutors of the US Embassy in Buenos Aires.

Diplomatic cables revealed years ago how Hadad —now a resident of Miami —acted as a trusted informant for ambassadors like Earl Anthony Wayne, reporting on internal political matters and serving as a mouthpiece for Washington's interests . Hadad 's talk of "quiet negotiations" sponsored by the U.S. is not mere hunching; it sounds like the planned leak of a roadmap designed in the North.

The Triangulation with Peronism "Ambassador"

Hadad is not alone in this narrative . He shares, suggestively, the views of figures on the Peronist right historically linked to the same diplomatic liaison, such as Guillermo Moreno and Miguel Pichetto . Both have hinted at the possibility that the Donald Trump administration might intervene with London. However, while Moreno invokes the slogan "America for the Americans" with a nostalgic interpretation, Hadad sets a date and a logistical framework: control of global trade routes.

Daniel Hadad's statements

"I have the feeling that we need to look at the continent to understand that, when Trump came to power, one of the first things he personally addressed was the state of the Panama Canal's ownership structure. The Panama Canal is increasingly strategically important because it's the passage from one side of the world to the other. So, the question is... I think BlackRock, an investment fund, perhaps the number one or number two in the world, quickly made an offer to one of the Chinese companies that was still involved in the Panama Canal and bought its stake."

But I think a lot of people started thinking, 'Well, what if this canal has a problem tomorrow? What if a missile hits it?' World trade would be suspended. And the inevitable step to replace the Panama Canal... to replace it there are two paths, or rather, the United States has two paths.

First: A very interesting president just won the election in Honduras, named Nasry Asfura, who met with the American president on Saturday. And I'm sure that one of the topics they discussed was building a high-speed train from the Atlantic coast to the Pacific coast to transport goods, constructing two ports so that one could be used to move goods to the other side of the world. That's complicated, it takes time, and it's expensive.

The most practical area where nothing needs to be done is the Drake Passage. For that to happen, the world needs the conflict between Argentina and Great Britain to end. I wouldn't be surprised, and I would say I wouldn't be surprised at all, if next year, in 2027, we see the beginning of negotiations between Argentina and Great Britain, perhaps sponsored by the United States or someone from the United States. And my only doubt is whether some former diplomats from both countries haven't already been talking for the last six months .

I think it's smart that they're negotiating quietly in the first stage, but obviously, if that part of the world could be at peace and without a latent conflict like the Malvinas/Malvinas conflict... it's been swept under the rug, but the conflict continues: Argentina claims sovereignty and Great Britain still doesn't accept that claim. And perhaps they should look for some kind of compromise and focus more on all the positive aspects that could come from it, rather than continuing the conflict indefinitely.

The Danger of the "Solomonic Solution"

In his statements, Hadad uses a term that sets off alarm bells in the national consciousness: a "Solomonic solution." In the language of capitulation diplomacy, "Solomonic" is usually synonymous with surrendering sovereignty in exchange for temporary commercial or financial benefits .

Hadad's proposal links the resolution of the conflict to the US need to secure passage through the Drake Passage and the Strait of Magellan. In this scenario, the Malvina Islands would cease to be a matter of territorial integrity and become a logistical asset for a foreign power .

Questions for the Argentine People

The current context, with a government of Javier Milei unconditionally aligned with the interests of the US and Israel, and the return of Donald Trump to the White House, transforms what Hadad presents as a "positive shock" into a latent threat.

From Agenda Malvinas , we warn that sovereignty is not negotiated in silence nor can it be gambled away in offices in Miami or Washington. The Malvinas Islands are, and always will be, Argentine territory, and any attempt at a "solution" that ignores the National Constitution and the history of our people's struggle will be denounced for what it is: a new betrayal of the nation.

Fountain:

Agenda Real - Canal 8 Stream