HORZONTAL DENTRO DE NOTA  - 700x80 SUPERIOR

An RAF Airbus flew between the Malvinas, Uruguay, and Chile without explanation from the Argentine government.

He flew back and forth from the Malvinas to Uruguay. Twenty-four hours later, he returned to Santiago, Chile. Flight times reveal that he inevitably crossed Argentine territory.

19 de September de 2025 13:38

The RAF Airbus A400M Atlas, registration ZM418, at Helsinki-Vantaa Airport, Finland, on January 20, 2024, as published on the specialized site: www.airteamimages.com

Although this is nothing new, as the situation has been repeating itself since 2016, in the last 24 hours , a series of flights by a British military transport plane crossing sovereign Argentine territory have been documented with certainty . This fact once again heightens the controversy stemming from the impunity that Javier Milei's government grants the United Kingdom , not only in trade, finance, and investment matters, but also in allowing the usurper's fighter jets to operate without inconvenience and, worse still, without complaints or information to justify them.

It is an Airbus A400M Atlas of the British Royal Air Force (RAF), registered ZM418 , which has been tracked on several occasions flying from the Mount Pleasant military base in the Malvina Islands to neighboring countries.

Flightradar24 flight tracking platform records documented that the aircraft made the following flights :

Sunday, September 14: ZM418 flew from Mount Pleasant to Montevideo, Uruguay, a flight lasting approximately 3 hours and 23 minutes. That same day, the aircraft returned to the Malvinas, although there is no record of this final return flight.

Monday, September 15: The plane departed again from Mount Pleasant, this time bound for Santiago, Chile, on a 5-hour, 23-minute flight.

Wednesday, September 17: ZM418 completed its return trip, flying from Santiago, Chile back to Mount Pleasant base in a 5-hour flight.

 

 

Thus, the duration of these flights, especially those to Chile, indicates that the aircraft did not make a longer circuit south of Cape Horn to avoid Argentine airspace. On the contrary, the short duration of the flights indicates that the plane flew over Argentine mainland territory, either as far as Punta Arenas and from there to Santiago, or that it directly crossed Patagonia. In both cases, these are two operations that occurred without the Argentine Foreign Ministry or any government department issuing a public statement regarding whether special permits were granted for these military flights, or whether there was a greater violation of national airspace .

A Military Projection Pattern in the South Atlantic

These flights are part of a broader context of British military projection in the South Atlantic . Despite United Nations resolutions calling for a resolution to the sovereignty dispute with Argentina, London maintains a significant military presence in the Malvina Islands.

This is not the first incident of this type, and it likely won't be the last. In January of this year, another similar military aircraft, registered ZM421, caused alarm by coming dangerously close to commercial flights operated by Aerolíneas Argentinas and Flybondi connecting Buenos Aires with Ushuaia . At that moment, the military aircraft turned off its transponder, raising suspicions about its actual distance from the civilian aircraft.

Events of this nature raise serious questions about sovereignty and security in Argentine skies, as well as about the current government's foreign policy regarding the British military presence in the Malvina Islands. The lack of official communication from Argentine authorities regarding these flight permits generates concern and an information gap that fuels public debate and a wide range of suspicions .

 

Tags

Other news about Malvinas

Might interest you

COMMENTS

foto de perfil
Héctor Gutiérrez 1 day ago

Ja ja si claro, no tenemos interceptores... tampoco radares Ja Ja ¿quién nos dijo que el airbus militar británico burló el espacio aéreo nuestro? ¿Chile? Ja Ja, parece que hay algunos ingenuos que creen que nosotros tenemos amigos aliados que nos dan información de inteligencia Ja Ja

foto de perfil
Carlos 1 day ago

Estos temas geopoliticos no llegan a la gente, la base es desinformar, y mientras menos conocimiento obtengas más favorece a aquellos a quienes no les importa el tema Es llamativo también, que países que se dicen afines al nuestro como ESPAÑA, tenga barcos depredando la pesca con permisos ilegales dados por los usurpadora ingleses. Sería muy bueno que estos temas sean compartidos en los principales portales de argentina.

foto de perfil
Cristian Ezequiel Cruz 1 day ago

Parecen que mucho no entienden que hasta el día de hoy la fuerza aérea argentina está desbaratada los A4 no están volando están fuera de servicio los pampa son mayormente usados como aviones de entrenamiento de pilotos no son caza con que van a interceptar a ese avión a hs uds creen que solo ese avión violo nuestro territorio Aéreo millones nos deben hacer inteligencia desde grandes altura dónde no tenemos como interceptar ni hacer frente

foto de perfil
Héctor Gutiérrez 1 day ago

Obvio que hay que "interceptarlos" por volar el espacio aéreo argentino sin el permiso correspondiente, no atacarlos, mucho menos derribarlos. Sí tenemos aviones interceptores y podemos hacer las quejas y pedir las sanciones y que quede el antecedente de provocación del RU a un país libre y soberano. Reitero ¿qué pasa si una avioneta (un pipper) argentino vuela sobre Malvinas?, ojo no hablé de un avión de guerra.

foto de perfil
Pedro Cressall 1 day ago

Sobrevolar territorio ajeno require permiso anterior. No tiene nada que ver con la soberanía de las islas.

foto de perfil
Pepe 2 days ago

Y con que lo van a interceptar si no hay aviones? Ves cuando dicen....para que compraron los f16 con esa plata podríamos...bla bla bla Ahi tenes, los piratas hacen lo que se les canta

foto de perfil
Héctor Gutiérrez 2 days ago

¿Y porqué no fue interceptado por la fuerza aérea argentina?, siempre en jurisdicción argentina. ¿Qué pasaría si un avión nuestro, incluso civil, volara sobre territorio o zona de exclusión malvinense?

Log in or sign up to comment.