Hours before his arrival in Tierra del Fuego on an election campaign train, former Kirchnerist official Guillermo Moreno has surpassed the limits of audacity by establishing himself in the realm of strategic abdication.

His recent opinion on Radio del Plata , which crowns the United States as the only partner capable of returning the Malvinas to us , is not "realpolitik" ; it is a historical surrender wrapped in geopolitical gift paper .

MORENO ON THE IMPORTANCE OF ALIGNMENT PROPERLY TO RECOVER THE MalvinaS AND THE USEFUL IDIOTS WHO PLAY AGAINST THE NATIONAL INTEREST 09/29/2025

🗣️"Careful guys, there are a lot of useful idiots, and there are also those who are next to you and call themselves… pic.twitter.com/5T4MIp8v9p

While disqualifying those who do not think like him as "useful idiots" and "little people ", Moreno He proclaimed himself the sole interpreter of the "national interest" by proposing that Argentina throw itself into the arms of the same power that guaranteed the British victory in 1982.

The Friend of My Enemy Fallacy

Moreno bases his strategy on the following premise: "Our enemy is the one who has usurped the territory that is Great Britain. It is neither China nor the United States." Omitting intentionally, that the enemy of Argentine sovereignty in the Malvinas is, and always has been, the Anglo-American pact .

Moreno has not lost his memory; armed with a guaranguería, he tries to cover up the evidence of the historical relationship between the British Empire and the Yankee Empire . The latter, in December 1831, attacked the Argentine settlement of Puerto Luis with the American frigate USS Lexington, and that 150 years later violated the TIAR (Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance) and provided Great Britain with the satellite intelligence, logistics and weapons decisive for the war .

Asking Washington today to expel its privileged strategic and military partner (the United Kingdom) from a NATO base in the South Atlantic is like crying out for a miracle or, worse, for a self-deception that Moreno wants to make collective.

US aid in the region has never been disinterested; it has always been a pincer operation to ensure its hegemony and control of resources.

The "country-to-country" agreement Moreno celebrates, downplaying Milei as an "accident," is the institutional formula for handing us over to the U.S., allowing it to exercise total control over Argentina's economic, financial, and military policies.

America for Whom? The Deception of the Monroe Doctrine

Moreno appeals to the anachronistic Monroe Doctrine ("America for Americans" ) as a moral justification for the alliance . This concept, in historical practice, has always meant "America for U.S. interests," and has been the ideological umbrella for military interventionism and continental economic subordination .

Moreno's argument, justifying that the Chinese threat forced the US to interfere in Argentina's destiny, is an accurate diagnosis of imperial fear, but his conclusion is that of a feudal subject, not a Peronist.

Instead of taking advantage of global competition to negotiate from a Third Position of strength and autonomy, Moreno chooses unconditional alignment, offering Argentina as a sacrificial pawn on the global chessboard.

The supposed need to "get rid of the Chinese" in order to "reindustrialize" is the height of contradiction. Latin American history shows that the "partnership" with the US under the conditions proposed by Moreno resulted in financial openness, deregulation, indebtedness, and deindustrialization , not in the productive sovereignty that Peronism claims to defend .

The "Useful Idiot" in the Mirror

Moreno's virulent attack on the "littleboobs" who don't share his vision —accusing them of having "terminals elsewhere"—is a classic smokescreen. The question is stark : who truly boasts "terminals elsewhere"? Who denounces the surrender of sovereignty to a historic imperial power, or who shamelessly promotes vassalage to Washington in exchange for the empty promise of a favor regarding the Malvinas Islands?

National sovereignty is not a handout begged from a friend of an enemy. It is a non-negotiable exercise of autonomy, dignity, and strategic firmness. Moreno's proposal is, in essence, a blank check to the United States, the only certainty of which will be the total loss of Argentina's room for maneuver.

 Far from rescuing the Third Position, Moreno dismantles it, embracing colonial subordination with a vehemence that makes him, ironically, the most effective spokesperson for interests alien to the nation. The path to sovereignty is on foot, on one's own path, and never on one's knees.