The strong public exposure of the military "collaboration" promoted by the Ministry of Defense has forced the government to reverse its controversial meetings with the United Kingdom. Following national condemnation, both the private summit of the Naval Staff at the British Embassy and the academic conference at the UNDEF were canceled.
The Blockade of the "Gala" Summit
According to Agenda Malvinas , on the afternoon of Tuesday, October 14 , at 6:00 p.m., the six high-ranking Argentine Navy officers were neither registered nor admitted to the administrative entrance of the British Embassy (Luis Agote 2412). The Force's leadership, which had been "requested" to hear about the British experience as NATO commander in Ukraine, did not show up, highlighting the discomfort generated by the cable leak.
While there is no evidence that the meeting was moved to another location or held in secret, the failure to appear at the scheduled time and place is a clear indication of the pressure being exerted . This potential act of rectification occurs, ironically, in a Force that still wears its dress uniform in mourning for Admiral Nelson, a British hero, despite his Navy's act of cowardice in 1982, when it torpedoed the cruiser ARA General Belgrano outside the exclusion zone.
UNDEF canceled due to “inconveniences”
Hours later, on Wednesday, the National Defense University (UNDEF) officially announced the cancellation of the other event . In a brief statement to faculty and students, the rectorate announced the cancellation of the conference "Modern Warfare: Perspectives and Lessons from the Conflict in Ukraine," scheduled for Thursday, October 16.

As you can read, the statement limited itself to expressing its gratitude for the interest and regretting "any inconvenience the cancellation may cause." It does not mention, however, that the "inconvenience" was the public exposure of the attempt to naturalize relations with the power that has invaded the Malvina Islands archipelago and 1.6 million square kilometers of island and maritime territory in the Argentine South Atlantic.
In short, everything indicates that the national unrest generated by the issue put an end to the dangerous normalization that the libertarian regime sought to grant to the military connection with the invader. The lack of official clarification from the Ministry of Defense only reinforces the conclusion: civic pressure succeeded in forcing the Executive to retract an approach that was, by all accounts, a mockery of national sovereignty.