"Cover the national flag and the map of Malvinas; remove the name "Malvinas Argentinas" from the Mendoza Soccer Stadium; prevent entry to the San Juan Stadium with Malvinas symbols.

30 de May de 2023 00:20

Train, so that ignorance does not subject the people to colonization, the plundering of their essential resources and consequent poverty.

Law 27,671, passed on July 15, 2022, established mandatory, periodic and permanent training on the Question of the Malvinas Islands for all people who work in public service at all levels and hierarchies in the Executive and Legislative branches. and Judicial of the Nation; although, in our opinion, erroneously, this law refers to "the colonial situation in which the Malvinas, South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands (hereinafter Malvinas) and the corresponding maritime spaces are located, an integral part of Argentine territory, which since 1833 they have been the subject of a sovereignty dispute between Argentina and the United Kingdom, recognized by the General Assembly of the United Nations", when the sovereign rights of Argentina over those territories should be highlighted, plain and simple, and claimed against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (hereinafter the United Kingdom) the return of the Malvinas, in addition to Antarctica and its waters and the extended continental shelf (spaces not indicated); in complete agreement, with Res. 1514 (XV) of 12/14/1960 of the 947th General Assembly of the United Nations, which, in particular, prescribes: "... all peoples have an inalienable right (...) to the exercise of its sovereignty and the integrity of its national territory (that) the subjection of peoples to foreign subjugation, domination and exploitation constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights, is contrary to the Charter of the United Nations and compromises the cause of peace and of global cooperation (that) all armed action or all repressive measures of any kind directed against them must cease, and the integrity of their national territory must be respected (that) all attempts aimed at totally or partially breaking national unity and territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations (and that) All States must faithfully and strictly observe the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations (…) on the basis of equality, non-intervention in the internal affairs of other States and respect for the sovereign rights of all States. peoples and their territorial integrity.

This is not then a dispute, but rather the arrogant appropriation by the United Kingdom of island and maritime spaces that form an indivisible part of the Argentine territory and the exploitation of its natural resources, which curtails national sovereignty and impoverishes the Argentine people.

According to the International Court of Justice "An international legal dispute may be defined as a disagreement over a question of law or fact, a conflict or clash of legal views or interests" ( Manual on Acceptance of the Jurisdiction of the Court International Justice, 2017-2023 ) and, according to   The RAE “ dispute ”, which comes from the Latin “ disputare ”, defines this word “as examining an issue point by point; explain something reasonedly or, controvert” and, if “ the dispute ” is a controversy; that is, a repeated discussion between two or more who defend contrary opinions and, if Argentina accepted the scope of this etymological meaning, it would be taking away the forcefulness that is expressed with an energy that does not give rise to discussion and, the certainty of the conviction set forth in the First Transitory Provision of the National Constitution that reads: " The Argentine Nation ratifies its legitimate and imprescriptible sovereignty over the Malvinas, South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands and the corresponding maritime and island spaces, as they are an integral part of the national territory. The recovery of said territories and the full exercise of sovereignty, respecting the way of life of its inhabitants, and in accordance with the principles of International Law, constitute a permanent and inalienable objective of the Argentine people.

National sovereignty is beyond the dispute recognized by UN Res. 2065/65 (XX) despite the British occupation; since what Argentina must demand is its full exercise curtailed by this foreign power. Contrary positions are not under discussion, the return of the archipelagos and occupied waters must be demanded, in addition to carrying out other active non-war measures, which the Secretariat of the Malvinas does not carry, aimed at weakening the position of the United Kingdom in the Malvinas and recovering the usurped territory.

The training cannot be limited to detailing background and rights as mentioned in article 6 of the Law, but rather to advance in explaining what the appropriation of the United Kingdom of these important national spaces represents politically, strategically, economically, socially and territorially, for Argentines. .

Law 27,671 states in its article 3 that training will be in the hands of the Enforcement Authority and Decree 720/2022 establishes that this function will be in the hands of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs through the Secretariat of Malvinas, Antarctica and the South Atlantic. , who one year after this law was passed and three years after Law 27,558 was approved creating the National Council of Malvinas, which in its article 2 established among its functions that of "carrying out actions aimed at collaborating in the dissemination and promotion of human rights." Argentines on the Malvinas Islands…”; who in light of the recent events, where FIFA, with the agreement of the AFA and the government of Mendoza, decided to cover the poster of the national flag and the image of the Malvinas Islands, in addition to changing the name “Malvinas Argentinas” to the soccer stadium chosen to play the U-20 World Cup and in the Bicentennial Stadium of San Juan people with symbols referring to the Malvinas were prevented from entering; which, demonstrating the inaction or failure of the government's actions to highlight and internalize the importance of “the Malvinas Question” and, on the contrary, with an economistic criterion, national sovereignty is trivialized, with total contempt for the popular mandate.

Very poor.A true example of submission and inadmissible lack of national dissemination of Argentine rights over these national territories and an excess of powers of international and national institutions in matters that violate the National Constitution.

By Agenda Malvinas


Other news about National

Might interest you


No comments yet

Log in or sign up to comment.