Defense Minister Luis Petri dismissed 23 military personnel who had been convicted of crimes against humanity committed during the last dictatorship. State terrorism activist Cecilia Pando said it was a “soul-wrenching decision.”
In a statement, the Ministry of Defense maintained that they were merely complying with an order from the Judiciary. Petri signed resolution 2025-72 with the dismissal of former high-ranking Army officials. In the text, he acknowledged that the Argentine State has international obligations in this matter and recalled what the Office of the Administrative Investigations (PIA) had told him about the fact that “the obligation to remove from their posts agents implicated in serious human rights violations constitutes an autonomous obligation of the Argentine State, in accordance with International Law.”
As highlighted by Página|12, “the decision affected, among others, Eduardo Rodolfo Cabanillas – sentenced to life in prison for crimes in Automotores Orletti–, Pascual Guerrieri – with sentences both in Buenos Aires (for his role in the 601 Intelligence Battalion in the kidnappings of militants who were part of the Montonero Counteroffensive) and in Rosario–, Federico Minicucci – head of the La Tablada regiment–, and Héctor Salvador Girbone – sentenced for the kidnapping of Pablo Gaona Miranda, among others.”
Horacio Losito , the retired colonel who has three convictions for crimes against humanity under his belt and who was granted conditional release, was also discharged. Among the crimes he was charged with, one of them was the massacre in a forest in the town of Margarita Belén, perpetrated on December 13, 1976, where a group of political prisoners were tortured and murdered in a joint operation by the Argentine Army and the Chaco Police about 30 kilometers from Resistencia, on the way to Formosa. Losito was part of the commando company with the father of the vice president, Victoria Villarruel , during the armed conflict of 1982 and was honored last year in the Apóstoles regiment as a “hero” of the Malvinas War, flouting the prohibition that governs honoring those who attacked democracy or committed crimes during state terrorism.
Once again, the dual nature of some supposed “heroes” of the Malvinas war is evident. They were the executioners and murderers of the Argentine people during the dictatorship. Those who, as Leon Rozitchner pointed out, tried to legitimize their horrendous crimes by moving from the “dirty war” to the “clean war” using the Malvinas cause for this purpose.
The association that brings together lawyers who act as defenders of repressors, torturers, murderers and kidnappers of babies in cases of crimes against humanity expressed their displeasure. “A measure of this nature could be expected during the Kirchnerist government, which made justice an instrument of revenge for terrorist organizations, and Defense policies a permanent humiliation for the uniformed personnel,” ranted Cecilia Pando on her social networks.
The Ministry of Defense maintained that they were complying with a judicial provision: "The aforementioned losses do not respond to a unilateral decision of this Ministry, but to an order of the Judicial Branch, notified by the Public Prosecutor's Office, requiring compliance with the measure with respect to military personnel affected by final convictions."
Colonel (R), Marcelo Alejandro Rozas Garay , Secretary of Strategy and Military Affairs (SEAM) stated that: “Since the beginning of the administration we have worked for a complete memory and for our forces to be respected and valued by a political system that had discredited and humiliated them” , through his X account. In addition, he said that: “To serve a firm sentence is to respect the values of the Republic” .
It is true that the Attorney General's Office requested that those convicted of crimes against humanity be discharged. However, the unit told Página/12 that Petri only moved forward with half of the requests that had been submitted. "Just the requests from the Army that we requested are more than double those that are in that resolution," they stressed. In that case, it would be clear that Petri 's administration prioritized or decided who to discharge.
Sources:
Provincial Commission for Memory